Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bigfoot-Sasquatch-Yeti:

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bigfoot-Sasquatch-Yeti:

    What say you? The "Patterson Gimlin" tape makes me say, hmmmmmm...




    "L E X - T A L I O N I S"

    #2
    10 characters
    Last edited by Sock; 12-23-2015, 09:53 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      Check out Bill Munns Analysis of the Patterson film.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs

      Comment


        #4
        Fingerprint examiner and primate print expert Jimmy Chilcutt on sasquatch print dermal ridges.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJqCsPccRpk

        Comment


          #5
          One of my favorite theories on the origens of Bigfoot is the Gigantopithecus.
          If Gigantopithecus was still living when humans crossed from Asia to North America it could have come across as well and might still survive in the Pacific NW.

          The Gigantopithecus is an extinct genus of ape that existed from perhaps nine million years to as recently as one hundred thousand years ago, in what is now China, India, and Vietnam, placing Gigantopithecus in the same time frame and geographical location as several hominin species. The fossil record suggests that individuals of the species Gigantopithecus blacki were the largest known apes that ever lived, standing up to 9.8 ft and weighing up to 1,190 lb.


          The Gigantopithecus might also explain these three creatures that have been reported in asia.

          The Yeti an ape-like cryptid taller than an average human that is said to inhabit the Himalayan region of Nepal and Tibet.

          The Mande Burung is an alleged ape-like creature said to inhabit the Meghalaya subtropical forests in the remote Garo Hills of the north east of India and in Bangladesh.

          The Yeren is a legendary hybrid beast-man of Hubei Province, China


          Comment


            #6
            oh no, you didnt. not a bigfoot thread

            Comment


              #7
              I refuse to participate in this blatant slander.
              Textually Active

              Comment


                #8
                He did a really good rundown of it.

                Originally posted by Woods Devil View Post
                Check out Bill Munns Analysis of the Patterson film.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs
                "L E X - T A L I O N I S"

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'm almost 99% sure that they don't exist, but that 1% is intriguing.
                  "L E X - T A L I O N I S"

                  Comment


                    #10
                    That's about where I'm at but after my experience some years ago I started doing a lot of reading on the subject and came to the conclusion that I just don't know.

                    For those who say that it is impossible for a large primate or hominid to exist without us knowing about them I offer two examples.

                    The bili ape is the name given to large chimpanzees that inhabit Bili Forest in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

                    Locals had told of the 6' tall, 300 lb chimp or gorilla that lived in the forest for more than 100 years but their stories weren't taken seriously by many.

                    The bili ape has been observed by researchers and they did get some video.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bili_ape

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG77LO9PmxU


                    Indonesian hobbit legends may be explained by the discovery of Homo floresiensis on the nearby island of Flores. Some believe that a population of Hobbits could still survive.

                    http://rense.com/general61/indo.htm

                    http://humanorigins.si.edu/research/...search/hobbits

                    http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4077The2003

                    "The 2003 discovery of Homo floresiensis on Flores, another Indonesian island, was widely reported in the media as a "Hobbit", a new species of early human who lived a mere 12,000 to 18,000 years ago. What we have here is actual hard evidence that a creature, roughly similar to orang pendek in size and some other respects, did live in the vicinity at one time."
                    Last edited by Woods Devil; 10-19-2015, 05:22 AM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      One more just because I like the subject.

                      Some believe that Paul Freeman was a hoaxer and others consider his film and print casts to be the best evidence for bigfoot since the Patterson film.

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdlUu3Ag_cU

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I don't buy the Freeman video. The subject just doesn't move like I would expect a wild animal to. What are your thoughts?

                        Originally posted by Woods Devil View Post
                        One more just because I like the subject.

                        Some believe that Paul Freeman was a hoaxer and others consider his film and print casts to be the best evidence for bigfoot since the Patterson film.

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdlUu3Ag_cU
                        "L E X - T A L I O N I S"

                        Comment


                          #13
                          The same thought crossed my mind and it is claimed that Freeman admitted that he had faked prints before.

                          I tend to shy away from anyone who has anything to do with hoaxes myself but some do believe that it is convincing.

                          I guess bigfoot wouldn't need to run all the time and everywhere he went though.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            The patterson film was a dude in an ape suit. I say that as someone who wishes there to be such creatures. But the gait and stride were human not any type of simian or ape. And his feet were solid like a plywood sole and not flexible like a living foot. I know people will argue, and I am not saying they don't exist. But that was not a video of one in my opinion.

                            consider this also..........................

                            If they are so illusive, so rare that all these idiots out hunting/ off roading/ getting lost, haven't got a cell phone video, then why was the dude just strolling along and not behaving at all like a prey/ skittish creature?


                            i say faked.
                            Last edited by Mayaca; 10-22-2015, 05:54 PM.
                            Go Space Force!!!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Bob Gimlin one of the two men at Bluff Creek. I believe that he believes.

                              "L E X - T A L I O N I S"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X