Our Tax Money Is Hard @ Work - Feminism And Glaciers...

[mattmuttsmith]

http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early...515623368.long

Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.

Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work is based upon work supported by the US National Science Foundation under grant #1253779.

What the fuck is wrong with this world!

[mattmuttsmith]

http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1253779

Just so everyone knows how much of their tax money went to this bullshit I present you with the above link.

If you do not want to click it I will give you the mist of it below:

Awarded Amount to Date: $412,930.00
Investigator(s): Mark Carey [email protected] (Principal Investigator)

[mattmuttsmith]

This is what happens when a political extremist movement gets adopted by the .gov and hidden as science.

It's all bullshit.

[Stephan28]

I'll bet the glaciers are melting because of all the hot air produced by the yapping of feminists and of liberals in general. I wonder who I can get to fund my study.

[mattmuttsmith]

I'll bet the glaciers are melting because of all the hot air produced by the yapping of feminists and of liberals in general. I wonder who I can get to fund my study.

That is atleast worth 250k.

[Unclefred]

[mattmuttsmith]

That woman in the poster above on the left, needs a 6 month re education experience.

[Unclefred]

That woman in the poster above on the left, needs a 6 month re education experience.

Ironically, she's called Big Red on the internet.

[mattmuttsmith]

Ironically, she's called Big Red on the internet.

*full body shake from disgust*

[Talon]

It's all about "funding." These people get paid to "study" shit. They know if their findings don't jive with the narrative, they lose funding.

[mattmuttsmith]

It's all about "funding." These people get paid to "study" shit. They know if their findings don't jive with the narrative, they lose funding.

Its fucking intellectual fraud is what it is.

They should be in Levonsworth.

[Slats]

It was done by Sage Publications. Sage churns out such educational classics as Feminist Criminology, Feminist Theology. European Journal of Women's Studies, etc ad nauseam. I would have to fact check, but I believe Sage was responsible for the recent 'study' which concluded that men who smile at women are misogynists while men who do not smile at women are also misogynists. I am quite certain that Sage was one of the publications that was demonstrated positively to be negligent in their peer review process. Google Who's Afraid of Peer Review for the details.

[Slats]

My bad. The study, Nonverbal and Verbal Expressions of Men's Sexism in Mixed-Gender Interactions (and we can be assured by the title of the study that nobody went into it with a bias of any sort, mmm hmmm!) was not done under Sage Publications.

[swampbilly]

Ironically, she's called Big Red on the internet.

Fucker...beat me to it

[Admin]

http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1253779

Just so everyone knows how much of their tax money went to this bullshit I present you with the above link.

If you do not want to click it I will give you the mist of it below:

Awarded Amount to Date: $412,930.00
Investigator(s): Mark Carey [email protected] (Principal Investigator)

The abstract says nothing about feminism.